Hire and Retain Top Talent

Create digital twins of candidates and employees. Predict their responses before critical conversations. Build stronger teams.

Mind Reasoner

The Paradigm Shift

Stop guessing in high-stakes HR decisions. Create minds of candidates and employees. Predict exactly how they’ll respond—before offers, performance conversations, and retention discussions.

Result: Hire better talent and retain your best people.


Why HR Decisions Fail

The Problem

You’re making critical decisions blind:

  • Will this candidate accept our offer?
  • Is this employee about to leave?
  • How will they respond to feedback?
  • What keeps our top performers here?

You’re guessing. And losing talent because of it.

The Solution

Make decisions knowing:

  • Exactly what motivates this candidate
  • Which employees are flight risks
  • How to frame difficult conversations
  • What retains your best people

No more guessing. Just better talent decisions.


How It Works

Upload interview transcripts, 1-on-1 notes, or conversation records

Training: 5-15 minutes per person

Result: Digital twins that think and respond like your candidates and employees

Ask the mind any question:

  • “Will you accept our offer at this salary?”
  • “Are you considering leaving? What keeps you here?”
  • “How will you respond to this feedback?”

Result: Know exactly what they’ll say before the conversation

Enter conversations prepared:

  • Right offer for THIS candidate
  • Retention approach for THIS employee
  • Feedback framing that resonates

Result: Hire and retain significantly more top talent


What You Can Predict


Quick Start

Set up MCP Server (5 minutes, no coding):

MCP Quick Start →

In Claude:

$> "Create a mind for [Candidate/Employee Name],
>using /path/to/interview-transcript.vtt"

Wait 5-15 minutes for training

$> "Will you accept our offer at $150K?
>What concerns do you have about joining?"

Get predictions. Tailor your approach. Win the talent.


Implementation

Use Mind Reasoner through Claude Code

No coding. Just natural conversation in Claude.

You:

$> Create a mind for Sarah Kim, Senior Engineer candidate,
>using /Documents/interviews/sarah-kim-interview.vtt

Mind Reasoner:

✓ Created mind: "Sarah Kim - Senior Engineer Candidate"
✓ Training... (~10 min)

You:

$> Will Sarah accept our offer at $150K base + $50K equity?
>What concerns will she raise? What motivates her most?

Mind Reasoner:

Based on Sarah's interview patterns:
OFFER ACCEPTANCE: UNLIKELY at this package
Her priorities:
1. Compensation Gap: "$150K is below market"
Context: She mentioned current offers at $165K
Risk: Will use your offer as leverage elsewhere
What wins her: $165K+ to match competitive offers
2. Equity Value: "How much is equity actually worth?"
Context: Skeptical about startup equity
Risk: Discounts equity value significantly
What wins her: More cash, less equity weighting
3. Technical Growth: "Will I work on cutting-edge problems?"
Context: This is her #1 motivation (not comp)
Risk: Competing offer has more interesting tech
What wins her: Emphasize technical challenges + autonomy
Revised offer that wins her:
- $165K base (matches market)
- $30K equity (reduce since she discounts it)
- Lead role on AI infrastructure project
- Framed as "technical growth opportunity"

See All MCP Tools →


Next Steps

Questions? Email support@mindreasoner.com